
Over the years I have tried many different approaches on how to finish of the edge of a painting.
My goal was to find out which technique worked best and then be consistent on all my canvases.
My findings:
- It depends on the subject matter of the painting.
- I prefer a raw edge with natural markings.
- The Gallery Wrap approach looks to much like reproduction art.
I found for me that my favorite was an edge that is left untouched and yet showed markings from the history of the painting. Now to some this might come across as unfinished, I feel that in the age of reproduced art, a rough edge is the first way to tell if it’s a reproduction. When I look at a messy edge of a painting I feel like I am getting a sneak peak into the artist studio, it’s a treasure. My heart sinks a bit when I see an edge that was painted over to mimic a store bought print.
So below I have made a list of examples and the pros and cons of each.
What are you thoughts? Leave natural or paint the sides?
Dear Sam, I am a purist with the arts especially music–I sing only what the composer wanted. Whatever the artist feels. Are the edges what the artist is trying to portray? Do what you feel Sam.
Maria
Depending on the piece, but normally I do something to the edge that relates to the painting. But I really like the red you used .
Moo
I would keep the the Edges Natural, shows the hard work of the Artist, and normally Paintings are covered over with a frame sometimes, so I would say just stick with the Natural.
Ryan
I always paint the edges as an extention of the piece. For example…landscapes…I would wrap the image onto the edges eliminating the need for framing large pieces. In the event they want to frame little is lost of the composition. To me it also shows the history and hard work of the artist. I am as detailed on the edges as I am on the main surface.